Home News Local
FBN: Home Owner Associations Growing In Power While With Little Oversight Or Transparency Print E-mail
User Rating: / 3
PoorBest 
Local - Politics
Written by Staff   
Wednesday, 04 August 2010 17:39

Home Owner Associations Growing In Power While With Little Oversight Or Transparency (The FCCA Controversy In Sugar Land & What It Has Taught Us)

By, Nancy Hentschel

Home Owner Association (HOA) and Property Owner Association (POA) living is advertised to promote sales and to manage the homeowner population, but these “corporations” are specifically designed to disenfranchise most if not all the homeowners in the subdivision.

The HOA corporation is frequently controlled by the developers, builders, or even the vendors of the HOA corporation, such as the HOA management company and HOA attorneys.  These entities seek legislation to give the HOA board (and therefore its agents) ever more control over the property belonging to the homeowners.

This latter group has formed their own trade organization (Community Associations Institute), which not only lobbies for anti-homeowner laws but also uses funds from HOA corporation coffers (their “client”) in order to pay for the lobbying expenses. One should note that these HOA funds were taken from the homeowners under threat of foreclosure (from assessments).  The foreclosure power is used primarily to benefit these vendors, not the homeowners of the HOA.

Even HOAs that are self-managed often unwittingly have board authority usurped by slick talk from CAI member vendors.  The CAI often masquerades as an “educational” organization but it is actually trade-lobby group operating for the benefit of HOA management companies and HOA attorneys. Many of these CAI management companies offer “educational classes” to indoctrinate gullible board members.  Conscientious homeowners that pose a threat to the gravy train often find themselves threatened with “fines” and lawsuits from these CAI vendors either via the proxy of the HOA corporation or direct threats from the CAI vendors themselves.  These vendors routinely work to ensure that the vast majority of the homeowners are disenfranchised from voting, access to records, running for elections, etc.  They seek to cause the HOA corporation to incur debt – in unlimited amounts and have adopted public policies opposing any limitation on assessment increases.  You see, most of these organizations are in the business of creating false debt (to themselves) via the HOA corporation and then using the HOA corporation’s foreclosure power to extort the money from the homeowner.  Not surprisingly, CAI also opposes the applicability of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to HOA corporations (and their agents)

Would anyone knowingly buy a home if he knew:

•    That the HOA board would incur debts without his approval – using the owner’s home as collateral?
•    That a trade organization would have total control of the owner’s home, his use of enjoyment of it, and even his ability to sell it
•    That he would need approval for every detail of his home maintenance and improvement
•    That HOAs frequently target for race, religion, and politics by selectively targeting other violations – like a blade of grass between the sidewalk joints, or a garbage can allegedly in view
•    That your assessment payments will be diverted to pay the HOA management company and HOA attorney whatever they demand instead of your assessments?
•    That the board could collect reimbursement of attorney’s fees and other costs incurred by the HOA against homeowners – even when the homeowner wins the case?
•    That the board had been granted all powers and the homeowners have no recourse but litigation – and the statutes that the homeowners are forced to rely upon have been, and continue to be, written by CAI for the benefit of the CAI attorneys and management companies?

Would anyone knowingly buy property burdened by a corporation that offers nothing but a perpetual obligation to pay money demanded by the corporation? The CAI is a parasitic trade organization that exists on the backs of homeowners and whose primary interest is to benefit vendors, e.g. management companies, attorneys, and HOA corporation service-providers. In CAI trade publications, advertisements invite vendors to “Get More $!” – and that “more” comes from homeowners. The CAI created the “structure” of the HOA industry to serve the CAI itself, NOT the homeowners.

The CAI frequently claims, at legislative sessions, that it represents homeowners, yet hires lobbyists to aggressively oppose legislation that would protect owners and their property rights.  The CAI even solicits contributions from HOA corporations (a “Buck a Door”) to finance its massive lobbying efforts to defeat pro-property rights and homeowner-friendly legislation. Homeowners are unknowingly forced to donate to lobbying efforts to defeat legislation that they desperately need.  Not surprisingly, CAI regularly lobbies against open meetings, open records, or open elections for HOA corporations.

First Colony is having a small taste of this disenfranchisement problem right now. A “survey” (done by a FCCA’s board member’s company – Mrs. Walter) was used to sell, manipulate and force the 11 million-dollar idea of ripping out five pools and one park, to install a parking lot and splash pad. A homeowners’ petition has been started that seeks to re-establish what homeowners perceive as their right to control the association they are members of. http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/firstcolonysaveourpoolsandparks

Despite over 1,000 signatures so far, and more coming in everyday, the board is plowing ahead with its vendors’ and board members’ corporate self-interests. The board’s action plan against homeowners opposed to the board’s wasteful project is to marginalize this informed and growing population as, “a small minority of people spreading misinformation and myths.” The FCCA actually fabricated and printed a list of myths, presumably because the homeowners had been too responsible and no myths actually existed before FCCA created the list. At additional homeowner expense, the FCCA has even hired a CAI public relations person to spin information and do damage control; instead of doing what the homeowners are insisting, and indeed what is in the best interests of the homeowners in this community.

The First Colony subdivision, like owners in other HOA-burdened subdivisions is a collection of trapped homeowners who have no choice, but to pay any financial liability that the HOA-corporation burdening their properties desires to push on them. This is true even when it means destroying owners’ property values and use and enjoyment of the property.

Developers and builders set up these HOA serfdoms, and the homeowner’s choice is limited to choosing between HOAs, as there are now so few homes not in HOAs. This is true, despite many homebuyers who desire to live outside HOAs in “unburdened properties,” and therefore inside constitutionally protected communities. The amenities, status, and imagined homeownership of living in an HOA are illusions created for a corporate-controlled system of private government with a private security force that works, in intriguingly “Blackwaterish” ways, directly for the private government. This is clearly not the “American Zone” that many expect in their home ownership.

This strange takeover of homeownership evolved slowly. In 1987, the Inwood North v. Harris, Texas Supreme Court decision gave HOAs the right to foreclose on single-family detached homes. In 1995, CAI attorney Michael Gainer wrote Property Code 204, which was passed with no publicity, in an 11th hour voice vote in the Legislature.  It opened up the reapportionment of assessments loophole that has since resulted in many strong-arm extortion tactics and foreclosure filings.

Because the economy is in a contraction phase, the HOA – forced spending model, has been growing rapidly and even expanding into use by city governments.  Cities are pushing HOAs to assume more of the city’s responsibilities, because it is very difficult for the city to raise taxes, whereas the HOAs can raise assessments indefinitely. In this way, elected city officials, who are often intricately connected to the HOA industry, can look fiscally conservative to the voters, while passing increasing expenses onto privatized HOA governments; Corporate governments that are not required to have open records, open meetings, or fair elections. For this reason, when angry homeowners speak out, and are given violation notices, they need to be aware of what is occurring. HOAs can foreclose for a torn basketball net, on a basketball goal that never existed, especially if the homeowner is NOT loud and visible about the abuse. When HOA vendors retaliate via the HOA corporation, it is no time for homeowners to be silent.  As we have seen in Sugar Land, cities that benefit from HOA spending will not step forward and protect homeowners.

When an HOA can foreclose on a man’s castle for a basketball net that never existed, or for “reapportioning assessments” by HOAs to pay contested fines and fees, which continue to allow foreclosure for trite claims (property Code 209 in 2003), then real property ownership ceases to exist, and homeowners are only under the illusion that they “own” property.

When homeowners sell their homes they often discover, like my neighbor did, that they are forced to pay fines for landscaping that was not approved, even if these projects were done a decade before the current owner ever owned the property. My neighbor paid a $2,000 fine, at his closing table – where he was made aware of the issue for the first time. He also paid transfer fees totaling $750 and other HOA fees just to get out of one HOA and into another.  Selling a home is an HOA vendor’s last opportunity to shakedown a seller before he moves. Most people will not object to this shakedown and stop the closing, because to do so might cost them more than a few extra thousand that the HOA is demanding.  In this way, these are clearly extortion practices.

Even after the developer and builders have turned over their class B voting rights and are no longer involved with the HOA corporation, their vendors and attorney are usually solidly in place. The Meadowcreek community in Fort Bend has struggled for years to get out from under the grip of its law firm, Holloway Jones. In the past, this law firm has “farmed” these homeowner-indentured servants unmercifully. With enormous effort, and years of difficult work, this community was able to fire this CAI legal vendor. Even so, the attorney left threatening to charge the Meadowcreek community tens of thousands of dollars for firing him.

HOA attorneys are a specialized group of attorneys who are trained by the CAI to know how to turn a $50.00 contested fine into a foreclosure process that can yield the attorney upwards of 20 thousand dollars in attorney fees. The reapportionment of assessments and many other tricks, are never made known to homeowners. In this way, homeowners can be led, one at a time, into “executive sessions,” and the foreclosure process, without alerting other homeowners. Isolated in this way, most homeowners are astonished that this process is legal. If the victim of this abuse speaks out, which is quite rare, due to carefully constructed marginalization techniques, others with an air of protective denial will simply say, “There must be more to their story than that!” Unfortunately, the real story about HOAs is much worse.

So how is this possible?  How did the HOA industry turn “servitude” into “membership” and “controlled by” into “belong to” and “corporate interests” into “community associations?” Think back to when you bought your home from the builder and developer.  HOAs prey on people’s natural suspicions of their neighbors as having hidden agendas to paint their home purple or jack up cars in the front yard. Homeowners are sold these fears in exchange for their freedom. This is not a new idea, is it? Depending on the income and social status of the community, these fears are manipulated to fit the buyer. CC&Rs are sold as tools to keep “others” in line, so that they don’t bring down “your” property values (implied personal status), However, CC&Rs are more often selectively used to target and “farm” people for income to the HOA corporation and its vendors, as well as for racial, religious, and political discrimination and manipulation. In addition, let’s face it, there is always the real probability that at least one board member is simply a bully.

Homeowners inadvertently allow this, because neighbors are kept in a constant state of isolated suspicion about each other. When one neighbor feels targeted, he often innocently points to five other homeowners who have the same violation. The HOA’s vendors, or employees, are paid to go after everyone, and are indeed happy to do so. In this way, targeted and confused neighbors, inadvertently support the HOA’s abusive structure by pointing out their neighbors instead of objecting to the structure of the problem. It is also true that one racist bully in your neighborhood will become a powerful favorite of any HOA management company and attorney. He will often even find his way onto the board.

HOAs also commonly target widows who tend to pay off their homes when a spouse dies. Tax records reveal equity and a skilled HOA attorney can tap into this information.  Some of these cases make it to the news, like Wenonah Blevins, Houston, and Captain Mike Clauer, Frisco, but most do not. When people are targeted by an HOA (remember that they are led to think that their HOA is their neighbors), they usually are either shamed into silence or they desire to move away from such disgusting neighbors. Either way, the HOA‘s secrecy remains intact!

Source: http://www.fortbendnow.com/2010/08/04/47120

 
Chron: Group wants reversal of state permit on landfill (Blue Ridge Near Missouri City) Print E-mail
User Rating: / 4
PoorBest 
Local - Community
Written by Responsible Development   
Tuesday, 03 August 2010 12:04

Group wants reversal of state permit on landfill
August 2, 2010 3:25 pm

By. Zen T.C. Zheng, Houston Chronicle

Despite an agreement reached between a landfill operator and leaders of a resident coalition opposed to that landfill’s expansion in east Fort Bend County, a group of coalition members aren’t giving up the fight yet.

Some of them have filed motions to overturn the state approval of a new permit for the continued operation and expansion of Blue Ridge Landfill.

Lisa Wheeler, a spokeswoman for the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality, said opponents have until the end of Wednesday to submit their requests for the commission to review the approval by Mark Vickery, the commission’s executive director.

After a drawn-out battle that started in 2006, leaders of the grassroots Coalition Against Blue Ridge Landfill Expansion in May reluctantly heeded to the advice of the group’s attorney Richard Morrison, who also is Precinct 1 county commissioner, to forgo their opposition in exchange of unannounced compromises from Republic Services, which is pursuing the project off FM 521 just north of Fresno.

Neither Morrison nor Gary McCuistion, a company spokesman, would disclose the details of the agreement, citing terms of confidentiality.

The coalition was the last group that abandoned the fight against the expansion, following three local television stations and the city of Pearland.

As part of the settlement, the group withdrew its original request for a contested case hearing, essentially a trial that would have been conducted by the State Office of Administrative Hearings.

On July 2, Vickery officially issued the company the new permit that allows for the expansion.

Despite slim chances of success, coalition member Rodrigo Carreon said some of his Fresno-area neighbors want the state commission to review and reverse the green light for the expansion that they said will harm their environment and quality of life.

The company is seeking state approval to add 1,345 acres to the 599-acre landfill, which would raise its height from 58 feet to 170 feet over 40 years.

In its deal with Pearland, the company agreed to limit the height to a maximum of 60 feet for 12 years, and then a maximum of 130 feet for an additional eight years. Additionally, Blue Ridge agreed to place grade breaks and landscape screening along the eastern slope of the landfill to minimize the visual impact of the landfill’s height.

“Many of us listed on the petition and complaint forms have been kept in the dark regarding what was agreed to,” wrote coalition member Chris Calvin in his letter to the commission.

“I have numerous questions regarding enforcement of the terms arranged by all these different organizations and would also like to know if the TCEQ becomes responsible for the enforcement and oversight of these separate agreements … Why was the information kept from us and the immediate general public?” . . . (get the full release below and related FBN report)

Source and related:

http://www.ultimatefortbend.com/2010/08/group-wants-reversal-state-permit-landfill

http://www.fortbendnow.com/2010/08/03/47124

 

 
FBN: Lack of Transparency a Problem In Fort Bend County Governments! Print E-mail
User Rating: / 4
PoorBest 
Local - Politics
Written by staff   
Wednesday, 28 July 2010 14:27

FBN Editorial: Fort Bend County Municipalities Need More Transparency
Wed, Jul 28, 2010

Howard Moline

I appreciate the series that Ms. Mock and the rest of (the FortBendNow) staff put together to shed some light on the status of crime reporting for the City of Sugar Land.  Those of us in other cities within Fort Bend County would like to see the same type of bright light put on this issue in our own municipalities. Transparency in these hard economic times is doubly important to residents like myself who have to sift through the sometimes obscure municipal press releases and communications that we find ourselves reading and doubting.  We need the facts.

What I personally don’t understand is why communities like Sugar Land and Missouri City feel such an overriding obligation to hide the truth. When residents know the true extent of crime in their neighborhood, they will take conscious steps to prevent themselves from being victimized. Hiding the actual incidence of burglaries, thefts, and violent crimes is a disservice to the City’s residents.

This is actually a very big deal.  Just to let you know, I don’t have too much sympathy for politicians.  I think they help their friends too much, that they’re partisan in too many decisions and that they don’t do enough for the people that voted them into office.

They’re badly treated by many of us and the truth is that they deserve it. Crime is a real problem in Fort Bend County and City officials need to recognize that, make sure we have enough boys in blue on the street and make sure that they are well paid for risking their lives.  Home invasions and driveway robberies are becoming a fairly common occurrence in Fort Bend County so crime is going to affect many of us sooner or later.

I understand that image and public relations are important but do they have to override all other factors? In order for citizens to adequately protect themselves and their families and to gauge the effectiveness of our city governments, we need to know the truth and we need to have City Councils who will put public safety funding and transparency first.

Source:

http://www.fortbendnow.com/2010/07/28/46989

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 55

Welcome

Active Groups

No active groups.

Latest Group Discussion

Latest Group Wall Posts

Upcoming Events

No GoogleMaps API key found for host: